Linux混入了mmu内存管理之后,ARM的中断是怎么样的呢?和我们在裸板上的中断有没有区别?让我们从源代码入手,做一个粗略的分析:
init/main.c->start_kernel()->trap_init()
//-----------------------------------------------
1.trap_init()
//gliethttp函数位于arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
void __init trap_init(void)
{
extern void __trap_init(unsigned long);
unsigned long base = vectors_base(); //返回中断base基址0xffff0000
__trap_init(base); //以base为vector基址,初始化中断向量表
if (base != 0)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "Relocating machine vectors to 0x%08lx\n",
base);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32
modify_domain(DOMAIN_USER, DOMAIN_CLIENT);
#endif
}
//--------------------------------------
2.vectors_base()
//gliethttp include/arch/asm-arm/proc-armv/system.h
extern unsigned long cr_alignment;
#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 4 //at91rm9200是ARMV4结构
#define vectors_base() ((cr_alignment & CR_V) ? 0xffff0000 : 0)
#else
#define vectors_base() (0)
#endif
可以看到ARMv4以下的版本,该地址固定为0;ARMv4及以上版本，ARM中断向量表的地址由CP15协处理器c1寄存器中V位(bit[13])控制,V和中断向量表的对应关系如下:
V=0 ～ 0x00000000~0x0000001C
V=1 ～ 0xffff0000~0xffff001C
//------------------------------------------
2.1 cr_alignment
//gliethttp arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
ENTRY(stext)
mov r12, r0
mov r0, #F_BIT | I_BIT | MODE_SVC @ make sure svc mode
msr cpsr_c, r0 @ and all irqs disabled
//__lookup_processor_type 查询处理器类型,[gliethttp 以后补上<浅析head-armv.S>]返回值
//2007-07-04
//r9 = processor ID //读取cp15的c0寄存器
//r10 = pointer to processor structure //下面会add pc, r10, #12,跳转到__arm920_setup
//gliethttp 在vmlinux-armv.lds.in中
//__proc_info_begin = .;
// *(.proc.info)
// __proc_info_end = .;
//见2.2
bl __lookup_processor_type
teq r10, #0 @ invalid processor?
moveq r0, #'p' @ yes, error 'p'
beq __error
bl __lookup_architecture_type
teq r7, #0 @ invalid architecture?
moveq r0, #'a' @ yes, error 'a'
beq __error
//__create_page_tables 创建arm启动临时使用的前4M页表
bl __create_page_tables
adr lr, __ret @ return address
add pc, r10, #12 @ initialise processor
.type __switch_data, %object
__switch_data: .long __mmap_switched
.long SYMBOL_NAME(__bss_start)
.long SYMBOL_NAME(_end)
.long SYMBOL_NAME(processor_id)
.long SYMBOL_NAME(__machine_arch_type)
.long SYMBOL_NAME(cr_alignment)
.long SYMBOL_NAME(init_task_union)+8192
/*
* Enable the MMU. This completely changes the structure of the visible
* memory space. You will not be able to trace execution through this.
* If you have an enquiry about this, *please* check the linux-arm-kernel
* mailing list archives BEFORE sending another post to the list.
*/
.type __ret, %function
__ret: ldr lr, __switch_data
mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0
//将__arm920_setup中设置的r0值,置入cp15协处理器c1寄存器中
mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 @ read it back.
mov r0, r0
//填充armv4中的三级流水线:mov r0,
r0 对应一个nop,所以对应2个nop和一个mov pc,lr刚好三个"无用"操作
mov r0, r0
mov pc, lr
//跳转到__mmap_switched函数 gliethtttp
/*
* The following fragment of code is executed with the MMU on, and uses
* absolute addresses; this is not position independent.
*
* r0 = processor control register
* r1 = machine ID
* r9 = processor ID
*/
.align 5
__mmap_switched:
adr r3, __switch_data + 4
ldmia r3, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sp}@ r2 = compat
//2007-07-04 gliethttp
//r4 ～ __bss_start
//r5 ～ _end
//r6 ～ processor_id
//r7 ～ __machine_arch_type
//r8 ～ cr_alignment
//sp ～ (init_task_union)+8192
//以下几步操作对processor_id,__machine_arch_type,cr_alignment赋值gliethttp
mov fp, #0 @ Clear BSS (and zero fp)
1: cmp r4, r5 //bss区清0
strcc fp, [r4],#4
bcc 1b
str r9, [r6] @ Save processor ID
str r1, [r7] @ Save machine type
#ifdef CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP
orr r0, r0, #2 @ ...........A.
#endif
bic r2, r0, #2 @ Clear 'A' bit
//r2存放 禁用TRAP队列故障 后的r0值
//r8->cr_alignment,cr_no_alignment
//所以stmia r8, {r0, r2}后,cr_alignment = r0,cr_no_alignment = r2
stmia r8, {r0, r2} @ Save control register values
b SYMBOL_NAME(start_kernel) //进入内核C程序
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.2 __arm920_proc_info
//gliethttp arch/arm/mm/proc-arm920.S
.section ".proc.info", #alloc, #execinstr
.type __arm920_proc_info,#object
__arm920_proc_info:
//该地址存储到r10中
.long 0x41009200
.long 0xff00fff0
.long 0x00000c1e @ mmuflags
b __arm920_setup
//add pc, r10, #12 gliethttp将使cpu执行b __arm920_setup跳转指令
.long cpu_arch_name
.long cpu_elf_name
.long HWCAP_SWP | HWCAP_HALF | HWCAP_THUMB
.long cpu_arm920_info
.long arm920_processor_functions
.size __arm920_proc_info, . - __arm920_proc_info
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.3 __arm920_setup
.section ".text.init", #alloc, #execinstr
__arm920_setup:
mov r0, #0
mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c7 @ invalidate I,D caches on v4
mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 4 @ drain write buffer on v4
mcr p15, 0, r0, c8, c7 @ invalidate I,D TLBs on v4
mcr p15, 0, r4, c2, c0 @ load page table pointer
mov r0, #0x1f @ Domains 0, 1 = client
mcr p15, 0, r0, c3, c0 @ load domain access register
mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0 @ get control register v4
/*
* Clear out 'unwanted' bits (then put them in if we need them)
*/
//gliethttp r0单元存放了cp15协处理器c1寄存器的值,如下代码对该值进行加工
@ VI ZFRS BLDP WCAM
bic r0, r0, #0x0e00 //清0 bit[9..11]
bic r0, r0, #0x0002 //清0 bit[1]
bic r0, r0, #0x000c
bic r0, r0, #0x1000 @ ...0 000. .... 000.
/*
* Turn on what we want
*/
orr r0, r0, #0x0031 //bit0=1 使能mmu
orr r0, r0, #0x2100 @ ..1. ...1 ..11 ...1//bit13=1 中断向量表基址为0xFFFF0000
#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE
orr r0, r0, #0x0004 @ .... .... .... .1..
#endif
#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE
orr r0, r0, #0x1000 @ ...1 .... .... ....
#endif
mov pc, lr
小结:通过以上的源码分析，我们可以清楚的看到vectors_base()返回的中断向量基址值为0xFFFF0000,接下来我们继续分析下面的源码:
3.__trap_ini()
//gliethttp函数位于arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
.align 5
__stubs_start:
/*
* Interrupt dispatcher
* Enter in IRQ mode, spsr = SVC/USR CPSR, lr = SVC/USR PC
*/
vector_IRQ: @
@ save mode specific registers
@
ldr r13, .LCsirq
sub lr, lr, #4
str lr, [r13] @ save lr_IRQ
mrs lr, spsr
str lr, [r13, #4] @ save spsr_IRQ
...略...
vector_addrexcptn:
b vector_addrexcptn
/*
* We group all the following data together to optimise
* for CPUs with separate I & D caches.
*/
.align 5
.LCvswi: .word vector_swi
.LCsirq: .word __temp_irq
.LCsund: .word __temp_und
.LCsabt: .word __temp_abt
__stubs_end:
.equ __real_stubs_start, .LCvectors + 0x200
.LCvectors: swi SYS_ERROR0
b __real_stubs_start + (vector_undefinstr - __stubs_start)
ldr pc, __real_stubs_start + (.LCvswi - __stubs_start)
b __real_stubs_start + (vector_prefetch - __stubs_start)
b __real_stubs_start + (vector_data - __stubs_start)
b __real_stubs_start + (vector_addrexcptn - __stubs_start)
b __real_stubs_start + (vector_IRQ - __stubs_start)
b __real_stubs_start + (vector_FIQ - __stubs_start)
ENTRY(__trap_init)
stmfd {r4 - r6, lr}
adr r1, .LCvectors @ set up the vectors
//通过adr指令获得与pc地址为偏移地址数据,最后r1=pc-0x2c
ldmia r1, {r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, ip, lr}
//将中断向量表跳转数据分别转存到r1,r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,ip,lr寄存器
stmia r0, {r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, ip, lr}
//根据编译器规则r0存放了函数__trap_init(base)传入的参数值base,其值为
//0xFFFF0000
//将r1,r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,ip,lr数据顺序转储到以虚拟地址0xFFFF0000为起始地址的空间
add r2, r0, #0x200
//r2=0xFFFF0000+0x200=0xFFFF2000
adr r0, __stubs_start@ copy stubs to 0x200
//r0=pc相对地址=pc-0x26c
adr r1, __stubs_end
//r1=pc相对地址=pc-0x40
1: ldr r3, [r0], #4
str r3, [r2], #4
//将__stubs_start
和__stubs_end之间的中断处理代码拷贝到以虚拟地址0xFFFF2000为起始地址的顺序空间
cmp r0, r1
blt 1b
LOADREGS(fd, {r4 - r6, pc})
这样我们来看看空间分布图:
虚拟地址 异常 处理代码
0xffff0000 reset swi SYS_ERROR0
0xffff0004 undefined b __real_stubs_start + (vector_undefinstr - __stubs_start)
0xffff0008 软件中断 ldr pc, __real_stubs_start + (.LCvswi - __stubs_start)
0xffff000c 取指令异常 b __real_stubs_start + (vector_prefetch - __stubs_start)
0xffff0010 数据异常 b __real_stubs_start + (vector_data - __stubs_start)
0xffff0014 reserved b __real_stubs_start + (vector_addrexcptn - __stubs_start)
0xffff0018 irq b __real_stubs_start + (vector_IRQ - __stubs_start)
0xffff001c fiq b __real_stubs_start + (vector_FIQ - __stubs_start)
...
0xffff2000 __stubs_start: ldr r13, .LCsirq
0xffff2004 sub lr, lr, #4
0xffff2008 str lr, [r13] @ save lr_IRQ
...
0xffff21a4 .LCsirq: .word __temp_irq
0xffff21a8 .LCsund: .word __temp_und
0xffff21ac .LCsabt: .word __temp_abt
如果你现在有这样一种疑惑?程序为什么编译地址是0xc0008000,将其直接拷贝到0xffff0000和0xffff2000为什么还能顺利执行,请参考我的另一篇blog《arm相对跳转到底是怎么回事》,主要原因是b指令是相对跳转指令,adr也是基于pc的前后偏移指令,当然对于ldr pc, __real_stubs_start + (.LCvswi - __stubs_start)是绝对地址赋值,所以最后pc会跳转到0xc000xxxx空间执行代码,其他的跳转如:b __real_stubs_start + (vector_IRQ - __stubs_start)都会到0xffff2xxxx相应的vector_IRQ处执行向量中断处理函数,还有一个要分析的问题是:.equ __real_stubs_start,
.LCvectors + 0x200,语句b __real_stubs_start
+ (vector_undefinstr - __stubs_start)就是跳转到LCvectors+0x200空间执行。举一个例子:
org 0x8000
reset b InitRest
...
InitRest:
...
那么reset标号的地址为0x8000,他的意思是在0x8000处向前跳转到InitRest,我们也可以这样来构造跳转:
org 0x8000
reset b (0x8000+(.InitRest - .reset))
...
InitRest:
...
以上的构造语句同样实现了相对0x8000地址的跳转
新闻来自: 新客网(www.xker.com) 详文参考：http://www.xker.com/page/e2007/0705/27472.html